In re Rosen

260 A.D. 905, 23 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5313

Opinion

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the petition dismissed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Callahan, J., in Matter of Katz v. Goldwater (ante, p. 495), handed down herewith. Present — [906]*906Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., concurs in the result; O’Malley, J., dissents and votes to affirm for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Matter of Katz v. Goldwater (ante, p. 499).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rosen, 260 A.D. 905, 23 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5313 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

260 A.D. 905 (In re Rosen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.