In re Roseboro

109 F. App'x 618
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 24, 2004
DocketNo. 04-7289
StatusPublished

This text of 109 F. App'x 618 (In re Roseboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Roseboro, 109 F. App'x 618 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Terry Lee Roseboro petitions for writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to grant relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976). In seeking mandamus relief, Roseboro carries the heavy burden of showing that he has no other adequate means to attain the relief sought and that his right to such relief is clear and indisputable. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). We find that Roseboro has failed to meet this burden. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Baker
860 F.2d 135 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 F. App'x 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roseboro-ca4-2004.