In re Rose
82 S.W.3d 523, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 3178
Opinions
ORDER
Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on March 20, 2002. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and real parties’ responses, is of the opinion that said petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. The relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DENIED.
Dissenting Opinion by Justice DORSEY.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Rose, 82 S.W.3d 523, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 3178 (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).
82 S.W.3d 523 (In re Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sullivan v. Protex Weatherproofing, Inc.
913 So. 2d 256 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2005)
Rudolph D. Sullivan, Jr. v. Protex Weatherproofing, Inc.
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2003