In re Rose
82 S.W.3d 523, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 3178
This text of 82 S.W.3d 523 (In re Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Rose, 82 S.W.3d 523, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 3178 (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinions
ORDER
Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on March 20, 2002. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and real parties’ responses, is of the opinion that said petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. The relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DENIED.
Dissenting Opinion by Justice DORSEY.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sullivan v. Protex Weatherproofing, Inc.
913 So. 2d 256 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2005)
Rudolph D. Sullivan, Jr. v. Protex Weatherproofing, Inc.
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2003
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
82 S.W.3d 523, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 3178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rose-texapp-2002.