In re Rose
248 A.D. 917, 291 N.Y.S. 415, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8068
Opinion
Order denying petitioners’ motion for a peremptory order of mandamus unanimously affirmed as matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Rose, 248 A.D. 917, 291 N.Y.S. 415, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8068 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 917 (In re Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.