In re Rose
248 A.D. 917, 291 N.Y.S. 415, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8068
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 30, 1936
StatusPublished
This text of 248 A.D. 917 (In re Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Rose, 248 A.D. 917, 291 N.Y.S. 415, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8068 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
Opinion
Order denying petitioners’ motion for a peremptory order of mandamus unanimously affirmed as matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 917, 291 N.Y.S. 415, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rose-nyappdiv-1936.