in Re Rose M. Barnett
This text of in Re Rose M. Barnett (in Re Rose M. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-05-00608-CV
IN RE Rose M. BARNETT
Original Mandamus Proceeding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 7, 2005
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. The court is of the opinion that relief should be denied. See Day v. Day, 603 S.W.2d 213 (Tex. 1980) (court granting divorce did not have exclusive jurisdiction to consider suit to enforce judgment lien provided for in property settlement agreement entered in divorce decree); Gant v. Gant, No. 05-01-00134-CV, 2002 WL 257700, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 25, 2002, no pet.) (same); Underhill v. Underhill, 614 S.W.2d 178 (Tex. Civ. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1981, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (court granting divorce did not have exclusive jurisdiction to consider suit brought to enforce amount due under property settlement agreement. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Rose M. Barnett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rose-m-barnett-texapp-2005.