in Re Rose M. Barnett

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 7, 2005
Docket04-05-00608-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Rose M. Barnett (in Re Rose M. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Rose M. Barnett, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION



No. 04-05-00608-CV


IN RE Rose M. BARNETT


Original Mandamus Proceeding


PER CURIAM

Sitting:            Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed:   September 7, 2005


PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

            The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. The court is of the opinion that relief should be denied. See Day v. Day, 603 S.W.2d 213 (Tex. 1980) (court granting divorce did not have exclusive jurisdiction to consider suit to enforce judgment lien provided for in property settlement agreement entered in divorce decree); Gant v. Gant, No. 05-01-00134-CV, 2002 WL 257700, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 25, 2002, no pet.) (same); Underhill v. Underhill, 614 S.W.2d 178 (Tex. Civ. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1981, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (court granting divorce did not have exclusive jurisdiction to consider suit brought to enforce amount due under property settlement agreement. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Day v. Day
603 S.W.2d 213 (Texas Supreme Court, 1980)
Underhill v. Underhill
614 S.W.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Rose M. Barnett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rose-m-barnett-texapp-2005.