In re Rose D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rose D.

39 A.D.3d 1280, 832 N.Y.S.2d 859

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.3d 1280 (In re Rose D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rose D., 39 A.D.3d 1280, 832 N.Y.S.2d 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Marianne Furfure, J.), entered December 15, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order adjudged that respondent Edward D. abused the child, placed respondent Edward D. under the supervision of petitioner for a period of 12 months and directed him to comply with the terms and conditions of an order of protection.

[1281]*1281Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by respondent-appellant and by the attorneys for the parties on April 2, 2007,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present—Martoche, J.E, Smith, Centra, Lunn and Feradotto, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Marianne Furfure, J.), entered December 15, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order adjudged that respondent Edward D. abused the child, placed respondent Edward D. under the supervision of petitioner for a period of 12 months and directed him to comply with the terms and conditions of an order of protection.

[1281]*1281Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by respondent-appellant and by the attorneys for the parties on April 2, 2007,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present—Martoche, J.E, Smith, Centra, Lunn and Feradotto, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.3d 1280, 832 N.Y.S.2d 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rose-d-nyappdiv-2007.