In re Roper

167 A.3d 1287, 230 N.J. 379, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 837
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 11, 2017·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-067, concluding that ANGELA M. ROPER of TOTOWA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be censured for violating RPC 1.7(a)(2)(conflict of interest with a client), RPC 1.10(a)(imputation of conflict of interest), and RPC 8.4(d)(conduet prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANGELA M- ROPER is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Roper, 167 A.3d 1287, 230 N.J. 379, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 837 (N.J. 2017).

167 A.3d 1287 (In re Roper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.