in Re Ropal Anderson, Gerald Busch and Hortencia Morales
This text of in Re Ropal Anderson, Gerald Busch and Hortencia Morales (in Re Ropal Anderson, Gerald Busch and Hortencia Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 5, 2015
No. 04-14-00856-CV
IN RE Ropal ANDERSON, Gerald Busch and Hortencia Morales
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
On January 2, 2015, relators filed a second emergency motion for temporary relief in this mandamus proceeding. The court has considered relators’ motion, and the response and reply of the parties. Relators’ second emergency motion for temporary relief is DENIED.
The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before the court.
It is so ORDERED on January 5th, 2015. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: _____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CI, styled In re Matthew Hileman, pending in the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ropal Anderson, Gerald Busch and Hortencia Morales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ropal-anderson-gerald-busch-and-hortencia-mo-texapp-2015.