in Re Ropal Anderson, Gerald Busch and Hortencia Morales
This text of in Re Ropal Anderson, Gerald Busch and Hortencia Morales (in Re Ropal Anderson, Gerald Busch and Hortencia Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 11, 2014
No. 04-14-00856-CV
IN RE Ropal ANDERSON, Gerald Busch and Hortencia Morales
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
On December 10, 2014, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this court no later than December 29, 2014. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.
Relators’ request for temporary relief is GRANTED IN PART. The trial court’s November 18, 2014 order authorizing the depositions of relators is temporarily stayed pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus filed in this court.
It is so ORDERED on December 11th, 2014. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: _____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CI, styled In re Matthew Hileman, pending in the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ropal Anderson, Gerald Busch and Hortencia Morales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ropal-anderson-gerald-busch-and-hortencia-mo-texapp-2014.