in Re Roosevelt Barnes, Jr.
This text of in Re Roosevelt Barnes, Jr. (in Re Roosevelt Barnes, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-09-00314-CV
IN RE ROOSEVELT BARNES, JR.
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Roosevelt Barnes, Jr. seeks mandamus relief to compel the trial court to set his case for trial. Barnes complains that he filed his suit on June 1, 2007, but that the trial court has neither set a trial date nor signed a final order. Barnes provides no information regarding what efforts, if any, he took to obtain a trial setting or a final order. Barnes has not established that the trial court refused to rule on a pending motion within a reasonable time. See In re Sarkissian, 243 S.W.3d 860, 861 (Tex. App.–Waco 2008, orig. proceeding). Barnes also failed to demonstrate his compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5. See In re Hensler, 27 S.W.3d 719, 720 (Tex. App.–Waco 2000, orig. proceeding); Tex. R. App. P. 9.5.
The relator has not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief from this Court. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Opinion Delivered August 27, 2009
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Roosevelt Barnes, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roosevelt-barnes-jr-texapp-2009.