Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Ronning

In re Ronning

288 A.D.2d 817, 735 N.Y.S.2d 430, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11670
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 30, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 288 A.D.2d 817 (In re Ronning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ronning, 288 A.D.2d 817, 735 N.Y.S.2d 430, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was disbarred by this Court in 1990 because of felony convictions for possession of cocaine (Matter of Ronning, 158 AD2d 807). He now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner opposes the application.

Because we conclude that respondent has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]), we deny the application for reinstatement.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application for reinstatement is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Ronning
158 A.D.2d 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 A.D.2d 817, 735 N.Y.S.2d 430, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronning-nyappdiv-2001.