in Re Ronnie Wayne Jackson

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 22, 2011·No. 01-11-00896-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued December 22, 2011

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas


NOS. 01-11-00893-CR

          01-11-00894-CR

          01-11-00895-CR

          01-11-00896-CR


IN RONNIE WAYNE JACKSON, Relator


Original Proceeding on Petitions for Writ of Mandamus


MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

Relator, Ronnie Wayne Jackson, has filed pro se petitions for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court has failed to act on his applications for writ of habeas corpus in the manner proscribed by law. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 3(c) (West 2005).

This Court does not have jurisdiction over matters related to applications for writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 §§ 3, 5; In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding) (“Article 11.07 contains no role for the courts of appeals; the only courts referred to are the convicting court and the Court of Criminal Appeals). Accordingly, we dismiss the petitions for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

Per Curiam

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.   

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



1           Relator has identified the underlying habeas corpus proceedings as Ex parte Jackson, Nos. 125000101010A, 124949001010A, 098983801010A, and 099257501010A in the 263rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jim Wallace presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Ronnie Wayne Jackson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

in Re Ronnie Wayne Jackson (in Re Ronnie Wayne Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re McAfee
53 S.W.3d 715 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)