In re Ronnie M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ronnie M.

81 A.D.3d 830, 916 N.Y.S.2d 806

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 A.D.3d 830 (In re Ronnie M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ronnie M., 81 A.D.3d 830, 916 N.Y.S.2d 806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.60 to authorize assisted outpatient treatment, Ronnie M. appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cutrona, J.), dated March 12, 2010, which directed him to comply with a program of assisted outpatient treatment for a period of six months.

Ordered that the appeal from the order and judgment is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order and judgment authorizing assisted outpatient treatment for a period of six months expired on September 12, 2010. Accordingly, the instant appeal is academic. Moreover, this appeal does not fall within the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Walters v Delligatti, 78 AD3d 853 [2010]; Festa v Festa, 76 AD3d 1047 [2010]; Matter of Giousos v Giousos, 73 AD3d 775 [2010]; Matter of Paraskevopoulos v Stavropoulos, 65 AD3d 1153 [2009]). Prudenti, P.J, Rivera, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.60 to authorize assisted outpatient treatment, Ronnie M. appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cutrona, J.), dated March 12, 2010, which directed him to comply with a program of assisted outpatient treatment for a period of six months.

Ordered that the appeal from the order and judgment is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order and judgment authorizing assisted outpatient treatment for a period of six months expired on September 12, 2010. Accordingly, the instant appeal is academic. Moreover, this appeal does not fall within the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Walters v Delligatti, 78 AD3d 853 [2010]; Festa v Festa, 76 AD3d 1047 [2010]; Matter of Giousos v Giousos, 73 AD3d 775 [2010]; Matter of Paraskevopoulos v Stavropoulos, 65 AD3d 1153 [2009]). Prudenti, P.J, Rivera, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.3d 830, 916 N.Y.S.2d 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronnie-m-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack