In re Ronnie M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ronnie M.

244 A.D.2d 281, 665 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11894

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 25, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 244 A.D.2d 281 (In re Ronnie M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ronnie M., 244 A.D.2d 281, 665 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about September 30, 1996, which, after a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts, which if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted robbery in the second degree, placed appellant with the Division for Youth for a period of up to 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s fact-finding determination was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The totality of the conduct of appellant and the other perpetrators established an attempted robbery and appellant’s intentional participation therein (see, Matter of Juan J., 81 NY2d 739; People v Bracey, 41 NY2d 296; Matter of Horatio B., 240 AD2d 197). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about September 30, 1996, which, after a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts, which if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted robbery in the second degree, placed appellant with the Division for Youth for a period of up to 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s fact-finding determination was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The totality of the conduct of appellant and the other perpetrators established an attempted robbery and appellant’s intentional participation therein (see, Matter of Juan J., 81 NY2d 739; People v Bracey, 41 NY2d 296; Matter of Horatio B., 240 AD2d 197). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D.2d 281, 665 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronnie-m-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack