in Re Ronnie J. Curtis
This text of in Re Ronnie J. Curtis (in Re Ronnie J. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-21-00332-CR __________________
IN RE RONNIE J. CURTIS
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Ronnie J. Curtis filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel DNA
testing. We notified Curtis of several defects in his petition, including his failure to
identify the respondent, the real party in interest, the trial court, and the case number.
See generally Tex. R. App. P. 52. Although we provided an opportunity for Curtis
to amend his petition, Curtis failed to cure the defects we identified in his petition.
We “may issue all writs of mandamus, agreeable to the principles of law
regulating those writs, against . . . a judge of a district . . . court in the court of appeals
district.” See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. Curtis failed to provide sufficient
information for this Court to determine its jurisdiction and the relator’s right to relief.
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.
1 PETITION DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on November 5, 2021 Opinion Delivered December 1, 2021 Do Not Publish
Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ronnie J. Curtis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronnie-j-curtis-texapp-2021.