In Re Ronnie Adam Cloud v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Ronnie Adam Cloud v. the State of Texas (In Re Ronnie Adam Cloud v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-23-00360-CR __________________
IN RE RONNIE ADAM CLOUD
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding 128th District Court of Orange County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. A990214 and A990217 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In an original proceeding filed in this Court, Ronnie Adam Cloud filed a
petition seeking what Cloud calls “a common law writ of error” and “a bill of
review.” In his filing, he argues that he is a “natural living man,” his final felony
convictions in Trial Cause Numbers A990214 and A990217 are void, and he
contends he was indicted and prosecuted by individual corporations acting ultra vires
1 and not by natural persons. He also mentions he is seeking a recovery of money on
what he calls a “counterclaim.”1
The exclusive State felony post-conviction judicial remedy available in Texas
is by application for a writ of habeas corpus under the procedure set out in article
11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See Ex parte Adams, 768 S.W.2d
281, 287 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07.
This Court does not have jurisdiction over post-conviction habeas corpus
proceedings. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.05.
This Court has original jurisdiction to issue only such writs as are necessary
to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a). Cloud has not
identified a final judgment or appealable order from which Cloud might perfect a
timely appeal at this time. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.220; Tex. Code Crim.
Proc. Ann. art. 44.02. Neither our original jurisdiction nor our appellate jurisdiction
is implicated in the original petition Cloud filed with this Court. Accordingly, we
dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
1 We address Cloud’s identical claims regarding what he says are three convictions out of Jefferson County in a separate proceeding filed in this Court as Number 09-23-00361-CR. 2 PETITION DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on December 5, 2023 Opinion Delivered December 6, 2023 Do Not Publish
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Ronnie Adam Cloud v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronnie-adam-cloud-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.