in Re Ronald Wayne Schofield v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 7, 2012
• Docket: 01-12-00110-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 7, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-12-00110-CR

———————————

IN RE RONALD WAYNE SCHOFIELD, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Ronald Wayne Schofield, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this Court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  Relator complains that respondent* has not ruled on his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc to grant him additional pre-sentence jail time credit.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.

Do not publish.   Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

---

*         Respondent is The Honorable David Garner of the 10th District Court, Galveston County, Texas.  Relator informs us that this original proceedings arises out of Cause No. 06CR3089, styled State of Texas v. Ronald Wayne Schofield, 10th District Court, Galveston County, Texas, the Honorable David Garner, presiding.  We affirmed relator’s conviction for the second-degree felony of failure to register as a sex offender in Schofield v. State, 274 S.W.3d 1, 4 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. ref’d).