in Re Ronald Wayne Schofield

Opinion

Opinion issued September 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07(3)(a) (West Supp.

2013).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

conviction for the second-degree felony of failure to register as a sex offender. Schofield v. State, 274 S.W.3d 1, 4 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. ref’d).

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-14-00670-CR ——————————— IN RE RONALD WAYNE SCHOFIELD, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Ronald Wayne Schofield, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the respondent trial court to rule on his pending application for a writ of habeas corpus seeking relief from his felony conviction for failure to register as a sex offender.1 1 Respondent is the Honorable Kerry L. Neves, 10th Judicial District Court of Galveston County, Texas. The underlying case is State of Texas v. Ronald Wayne Schofield, No. 06CR3089, 10th District Court, Galveston County, Texas, the Honorable Kerry L. Neves presiding. We affirmed relator’s