in Re Ronald W. Kennedy
This text of in Re Ronald W. Kennedy (in Re Ronald W. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ___________________
NO. 09-14-00515-CR ___________________
IN RE RONALD W. KENNEDY __________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Ronald W. Kennedy filed a petition for writ of mandamus, in which
he contends that the trial court’s order denying his petition for writ of mandamus
was “improper and void[.]”
We may grant mandamus relief only if the relator demonstrates that the act
sought to be compelled is purely ministerial and the relator has no other adequate
legal remedy. See State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34
S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). Kennedy has not shown that he is
entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of
mandamus.
1 PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on December 9, 2014 Opinion Delivered December 10, 2014 Do Not Publish
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ronald W. Kennedy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronald-w-kennedy-texapp-2014.