in Re Ronald Newell and Jody McBride

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: April 5, 2022
• Docket: 01-22-00238-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER Appellate case name: In re Ronald Newell and Jody McBride Appellate case number: 01-22-00238-CV Trial court case number: 2021-50845 Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County On March 30, 2022, relators, Ronald Newell and Jody McBride, filed a petition for writ of mandamus arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by granting the motion for partial summary judgment of real parties in interest Jacob Anslum, Jill Anslum, and Dustin Dittman, defendants and counter-plaintiffs in the underlying litigation, and Slegte Hond, LLC, intervenor in the underlying litigation. In the mandamus petition, relators request that this Court direct the trial court to vacate its February 22, 2022 “Order Granting Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs’ and Intervenor’s Traditional Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the Effectiveness of the Receiver’s Proxy.” On April 4, 2022, relators filed an “Emergency Motion to Stay or Abate Effectiveness of [the Trial Court’s] Order Voiding Another Court’s [Turnover] Receiver’s Irrevocable Proxy” with this Court, requesting that the Court “abate or stay the effectiveness” of the trial court’s order granting the partial summary judgment of real parties in interest pending our consideration of the mandamus petition. Relators’ motion for emergency relief to stay or abate the trial court’s February 22, 2022 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of real parties in interest is denied. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ April Farris X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 5, 2022