in Re Ronald Lamont Guyton

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 19, 2011
Docket10-11-00012-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Ronald Lamont Guyton (in Re Ronald Lamont Guyton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Ronald Lamont Guyton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-11-00012-CV

IN RE RONALD LAMONT GUYTON

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this original proceeding Relator Ronald Guyton seeks mandamus relief

against the Respondent District Clerk Marc Hamlin. Guyton states that the district clerk

has failed to provide him with copies of documents he requested pursuant to the Texas

Public Information Act. A court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of

mandamus against a district clerk except to protect or enforce its jurisdiction. See TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); In re Simmonds, 271 S.W.3d 874, 879 (Tex.

App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding). We dismiss Guyton’s writ of mandamus for want

of jurisdiction.1

1 Guyton also filed a motion for leave to file his application for writ of mandamus. The motion for leave is dismissed as moot because such motions are no longer required under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. AL SCOGGINS Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed January 19, 2011 [CV06]

In re Guyton Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Simmonds
271 S.W.3d 874 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Ronald Lamont Guyton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronald-lamont-guyton-texapp-2011.