in Re Ronald Lamont Guyton
This text of in Re Ronald Lamont Guyton (in Re Ronald Lamont Guyton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11-00012-CV
IN RE RONALD LAMONT GUYTON
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this original proceeding Relator Ronald Guyton seeks mandamus relief
against the Respondent District Clerk Marc Hamlin. Guyton states that the district clerk
has failed to provide him with copies of documents he requested pursuant to the Texas
Public Information Act. A court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of
mandamus against a district clerk except to protect or enforce its jurisdiction. See TEX.
GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); In re Simmonds, 271 S.W.3d 874, 879 (Tex.
App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding). We dismiss Guyton’s writ of mandamus for want
of jurisdiction.1
1 Guyton also filed a motion for leave to file his application for writ of mandamus. The motion for leave is dismissed as moot because such motions are no longer required under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. AL SCOGGINS Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed January 19, 2011 [CV06]
In re Guyton Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ronald Lamont Guyton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronald-lamont-guyton-texapp-2011.