In Re Ronald Graham
This text of 907 F.2d 1137 (In Re Ronald Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
907 F.2d 1137
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re Ronald GRAHAM, Petitioner.
No. 90-8003.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 4, 1990.
Decided June 19, 1990.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Ronald Graham, appellant pro se.
PETITION DENIED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Graham brought this mandamus petition seeking an order directing the magistrate to act in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 suit. The magistrate last acted in April 1990. Under these circumstances, we hold that the magistrate has not unduly delayed acting on Graham's suit. We therefore grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis and deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid in the decisional process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
907 F.2d 1137, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9855, 1990 WL 86370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronald-graham-ca4-1990.