in Re: Ronald E. Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 12, 2002
Docket01-02-00951-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Ronald E. Johnson (in Re: Ronald E. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Ronald E. Johnson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Opinion issued December 12, 2002



In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-02-00951-CV



IN RE RONALD E. JOHNSON, Relator



Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus



O P I N I O N

Relator, Ronald E. Johnson, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining about the trial court's (1) failure to rule on his motions in his 1997 civil rights suit seeking damages from a former Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division correctional officer, and (2) hold a trial. Relator also complains that senior district judge Erwin G. Ernst continues to act in the case despite having been recused. On November 22, 2002, Johnson filed a motion to set a hearing in this mandamus proceeding.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. All pending motions are denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Alcala, and Price. (2)

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

1. The Honorable Jerry A. Sandel, judge of the 278th District Court of Walker County. The underlying proceeding is trial court cause number 19,851-C, styled

Ronald Johnson v. Troy Saldana.

2. The Honorable Frank C. Price, former Justice, Court of Appeals, First District of Texas at Houston, participating by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Ronald E. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronald-e-johnson-texapp-2002.