in Re: Ronald E. Johnson
This text of in Re: Ronald E. Johnson (in Re: Ronald E. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-02-00951-CV
IN RE RONALD E. JOHNSON, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
O P I N I O N
Relator, Ronald E. Johnson, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining about the trial court's (1) failure to rule on his motions in his 1997 civil rights suit seeking damages from a former Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division correctional officer, and (2) hold a trial. Relator also complains that senior district judge Erwin G. Ernst continues to act in the case despite having been recused. On November 22, 2002, Johnson filed a motion to set a hearing in this mandamus proceeding.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. All pending motions are denied.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Taft, Alcala, and Price. (2)
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
1. The Honorable Jerry A. Sandel, judge of the 278th District Court of Walker
County. The underlying proceeding is trial court cause number 19,851-C, styled
2. The Honorable Frank C. Price, former Justice, Court of Appeals, First
District of Texas at Houston, participating by assignment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Ronald E. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronald-e-johnson-texapp-2002.