in Re Ronald E. Hawkins
This text of in Re Ronald E. Hawkins (in Re Ronald E. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed July 7, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-22-00474-CR
IN RE RONALD E. HAWKINS, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 178th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1180372-A
ORDER
On June 28, 2022, relator, Ronald E. Hawkins, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.
Relator’s petition does not comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 52.3(k)(1)(A) and 52.7(a). Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A) (“The appendix must contain: (A) a certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of”) (emphasis added); 52.7(a) (“Relator must file with the petition: (1) a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding; and (2) a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained.”) (emphasis added). To be a “certified or sworn copy,” in accordance with Rule 52, the document must be certified by the trial court clerk or attached to either a properly prepared affidavit or an unsworn declaration. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 132.001.
By this order, the court gives relator notice that the petition will be dismissed unless an amended petition is filed on or before August 8, 2022 that addresses the record issues discussed above. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); see also In re Kholaif, 624 S.W.3d 228, 231 (order), mand. dism’d, 615 S.W.3d 369 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020) (orig. proceeding).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ronald E. Hawkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronald-e-hawkins-texapp-2022.