In re Ronald E. Aronds

189 A.3d 706
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided August 2, 2018·No. 18-BG-504·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order changing respondent's status to practice law in the state of Tennessee to disability inactive; this court's May 24, 2018, order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why he should not be indefinitely suspended pursuant to a disability suspension under D.C. Bar R. XI § 13 as reciprocal discipline; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to the court order or the required D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 (g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Ronald E. Aronds is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI § 13. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI § 13 (g) for reinstatement, as well as D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and to the provisions of Rule XI § 16 (c) dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI § 14, including the filing of the required affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ronald E. Aronds, 189 A.3d 706 (D.C. 2018).

189 A.3d 706 (In re Ronald E. Aronds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.