in Re Ronald Dwayne Whitfield
This text of in Re Ronald Dwayne Whitfield (in Re Ronald Dwayne Whitfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 20, 2015.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-15-00659-CR NO. 14-15-00660-CR NO. 14-15-00661-CR NO. 14-15-00662-CR
IN RE RONALD DWAYNE WHITFIELD, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 174th, 337th, and 351st District Courts Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 492674, 525468, 528856, and 557164
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 5, 2015, relator Ronald Dwayne Whitfield filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial judges of the 174th, 337th, and 351st District Courts to render judgment. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. As the party seeking relief, relator has the burden of providing this Court with a sufficient record to establish his right to mandamus relief. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992); Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1) (relator must file with petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”). Because relator has not provided an adequate record, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ronald Dwayne Whitfield, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronald-dwayne-whitfield-texapp-2015.