in Re Ronald DePhino and Andrew Dennis
This text of in Re Ronald DePhino and Andrew Dennis (in Re Ronald DePhino and Andrew Dennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: In re Ronald DePinho and Andrew Dennis
Appellate case number: 01-14-00878-CV
Trial court case number: 2014-42165
Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County
On October 30, 2014, relators, Ronald DePinho and Andrew Dennis, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief. The motion for temporary relief is granted. The trial court’s October 14, 2014 order granting the Petition for Rule 202 Deposition and requiring relators to appear for depositions by November 7, 2014, is stayed. The stay is effective until disposition of relators’ petition for writ of mandamus or further order of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b).
The Court further requests a response to the petition from the real party in interest, Dr. William Bornmann. The response, if any, is due no later than November 14, 2014.
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature:/s/ Terry Jennings Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: October 31, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ronald DePhino and Andrew Dennis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronald-dephino-and-andrew-dennis-texapp-2014.