In re Ronald Anthony G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ronald Anthony G.

83 A.D.3d 608, 922 N.Y.S.2d 53

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 83 A.D.3d 608 (In re Ronald Anthony G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ronald Anthony G., 83 A.D.3d 608, 922 N.Y.S.2d 53 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan J. Knipps, J.), entered on or about August 24, 2009, which, after a fact-finding hearing, determined that respondent mother had neglected the child Ronald Anthony G. and derivatively neglected the child Samron G., and placed the children in foster care, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that the children’s physical, mental or emotional condition had been impaired or was in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a consequence of the mother’s untreated mental illness, her failure to follow medical advice regarding the proper feeding of one of the subject children and her decision to live on the street and sleep on the subway (see Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 368 [2004]; Matter of A.G., 253 AD2d 318, 326-327 [1999]).

Derivative neglect of the younger child was established by the evidence supporting neglect of his 13-month-older brother. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan J. Knipps, J.), entered on or about August 24, 2009, which, after a fact-finding hearing, determined that respondent mother had neglected the child Ronald Anthony G. and derivatively neglected the child Samron G., and placed the children in foster care, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that the children’s physical, mental or emotional condition had been impaired or was in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a consequence of the mother’s untreated mental illness, her failure to follow medical advice regarding the proper feeding of one of the subject children and her decision to live on the street and sleep on the subway (see Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 368 [2004]; Matter of A.G., 253 AD2d 318, 326-327 [1999]).

Derivative neglect of the younger child was established by the evidence supporting neglect of his 13-month-older brother. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.3d 608, 922 N.Y.S.2d 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronald-anthony-g-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack