In re Rombach
Opinion
|, Granted for the limited purpose of transferring this matter to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit.
On December 13, 2007, the Louisiana Board of Ethics made a decision to issue subpoenas to three Louisiana legislators (Relators). The decision to issue the subpoenas was made by the Board of Ethics as opposed to a decision of an administrative law judge or a subordinate presiding [721]*721officer. Section C(3) of LSA-R.S. 13:3667.31 provides that a legislative member who opposes the issuance of a subpoena may apply directly to this court for exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction if the subpoena is issued by a subordinate presiding officer or an administrative law judge. The provision does not provide for such direct review by this court of a subpoena issued by an agency. As such, there is no statutory authority for Relators to apply directly to this court for supervisory writs. Thus, we decline to exercise supervisory jurisdiction.
This matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, pursuant to LSA-R.S. 42:1142(A), which provides, in pertinent part, that “any preliminary, procedural, or intermediate action or ruling by the [Ethics] board or panel is subject |gto the supervisory jurisdiction of the appellate court as provided by Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Louisiana.”2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
973 So. 2d 720 (In re Rombach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.