In re Romanowski

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Romanowski

70 A.3d 601, 214 N.J. 515, 2013 WL 3579573, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 732

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 11, 2013·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-377, concluding that the formal ethics complaint (Docket No. VIII-2012-0041E) filed against CURTIS J. ROMANOWSKI of METUCHEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal ethics complaint filed against CURTIS J. ROMANOWSKI in Docket No. VIII-2012-0041E is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-377, concluding that the formal ethics complaint (Docket No. VIII-2012-0041E) filed against CURTIS J. ROMANOWSKI of METUCHEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal ethics complaint filed against CURTIS J. ROMANOWSKI in Docket No. VIII-2012-0041E is hereby dismissed.

In re Romanowski, 70 A.3d 601, 214 N.J. 515, 2013 WL 3579573, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 732 (N.J. 2013).

Pincite

70 A.3d 601 (In re Romanowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.