In re Romanowski

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Romanowski

70 A.3d 601, 214 N.J. 515, 2013 WL 3579573, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 732

DecidedJuly 11, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.3d 601 (In re Romanowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Romanowski, 70 A.3d 601, 214 N.J. 515, 2013 WL 3579573, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 732 (N.J. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-377, concluding that the formal ethics complaint (Docket No. VIII-2012-0041E) filed against CURTIS J. ROMANOWSKI of METUCHEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal ethics complaint filed against CURTIS J. ROMANOWSKI in Docket No. VIII-2012-0041E is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-377, concluding that the formal ethics complaint (Docket No. VIII-2012-0041E) filed against CURTIS J. ROMANOWSKI of METUCHEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal ethics complaint filed against CURTIS J. ROMANOWSKI in Docket No. VIII-2012-0041E is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.3d 601, 214 N.J. 515, 2013 WL 3579573, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-romanowski-nj-2013.