In re Roman R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Roman R.

13 A.D.3d 159, 785 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15065

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.3d 159 (In re Roman R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Roman R., 13 A.D.3d 159, 785 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered March 24, 1998 and June 20, 2001, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Application by appellant’s assigned counsel to withdraw is granted (see Matter of Louise Wise Servs., 131 AD2d 306 [1987]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Saxe, Friedman and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered March 24, 1998 and June 20, 2001, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Application by appellant’s assigned counsel to withdraw is granted (see Matter of Louise Wise Servs., 131 AD2d 306 [1987]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Saxe, Friedman and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.3d 159, 785 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roman-r-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack