in Re: Rolando G. Arafiles
This text of in Re: Rolando G. Arafiles (in Re: Rolando G. Arafiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
IN RE: ROLANDO G. ARAFILES, Relator. |
§ |
No. 08-11-00275-CR AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN MANDAMUS |
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, asking that we order the trial court to dismiss his prosecution for perjury because the county attorney and sheriff allegedly have not taken their oaths of office in the last two years. A writ of mandamus will issue to compel a trial court to perform a ministerial act when the relator has no adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007)(orig. proceeding). Relator’s petition and the accompanying record do not establish that this standard has been met. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
October 26, 2011
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Chew, C.J. (Senior)
Chew, C.J. (Senior), not participating
(Do Not Publish)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Rolando G. Arafiles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rolando-g-arafiles-texapp-2011.