in Re: Rolando Castro
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00344-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
IN RE: ROLANDO CASTRO ____________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1
On June 29, 2010, relator, Rolando Castro, filed a petition for writ of mandamus.
On July 7, 2010, the Court requested that the real party in interest, Transmontaigne, Inc.,
file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. Relator has now filed a motion to
dismiss this original proceeding. According to the motion to dismiss, the parties have
compromised and settled their differences.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and relator’s motion to dismiss
this original proceeding, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2.8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay h and d ow n a n o pinion b ut is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). this original proceeding is DISMISSED without reference to the merits thereof. Pending
motions, if any, are likewise DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 7th day of September, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Rolando Castro (in Re: Rolando Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.