in Re: Roland Casarez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 21, 2004
Docket13-04-00662-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Roland Casarez (in Re: Roland Casarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Roland Casarez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion




NUMBER 13-04-00662-CR


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

                               IN RE: ROLAND CASAREZ

__________________________________________________________________


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion


         Relator, Ricardo Garcia, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on December 15, 2004. On February 10, 2004, relator was found guilty of burglary of a habitation and aggravated robbery and sentenced to five years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice on count one and ten years on count two. On February 12, 2004, relator's court-appointed attorney filed a notice of appeal in the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2 (c). The trial court clerk did not, however, forward relator's notice of appeal to this Court until December 21, 2004. See id. rule 25.2(e). Relator's appeal, cause number 13-04-675, is now before this Court.

         Mandamus relief is appropriate only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or the violation of a duty imposed by law, and when there is no adequate appellate remedy. CSR Ltd. v. Link, 925 S.W.2d 591, 596 (Tex. 1996) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, having examined and fully considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and having noted relator's appeal is now on file in this Court, we are of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus filed on December 15, 2004, is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

                                                                                 PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 21st day of December, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CSR LTD. v. Link
925 S.W.2d 591 (Texas Supreme Court, 1996)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Roland Casarez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roland-casarez-texapp-2004.