In Re Rogers

719 S.E.2d 649, 395 S.C. 478, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 392
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 9, 2011
DocketNot in source
StatusPublished

This text of 719 S.E.2d 649 (In Re Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Rogers, 719 S.E.2d 649, 395 S.C. 478, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 392 (S.C. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b) and (c), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking the appointment of an attorney to protect respondent’s clients’ interests pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Steven Goldberg, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain. Mr. Goldberg shall take action as required by *479 Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Goldberg may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Steven Goldberg, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Steven Goldberg, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Goldberg’s office.

This appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless request is made to this Court for an extension.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Costa M. Pleicones, J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Bryngelson
719 S.E.2d 649 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 S.E.2d 649, 395 S.C. 478, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rogers-sc-2011.