In re Rogers

415 S.E.2d 818, 307 S.C. 468, 1992 S.C. LEXIS 66
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 16, 1992·Published

Opinion

CONSENT ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon Petition of the Office of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline asking for an Order temporarily suspending the license to practice law of the Respondent, John I. Rogers, III, pursuant to Par. 6 of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, Rule 413, SCACR, on the grounds that he has been convicted of a serious crime as defined in the Rule.

It appears that the Respondent has been convicted of a serious crime, and should be temporarily suspended from the practice of law. By consent,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent’s license to practice law is temporarily suspended until such time as the Complaint before the Board of Commissioners on [469] Grievances and Discipline can be processed to conclusion and until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order be filed and served, and, in accordance with Par. 6(a) of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, said order shall be made public.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rogers, 415 S.E.2d 818, 307 S.C. 468, 1992 S.C. LEXIS 66 (S.C. 1992).

415 S.E.2d 818 (In re Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.