In re Rogers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re Rogers

63 N.C. 409

DecidedJune 15, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 63 N.C. 409 (In re Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rogers, 63 N.C. 409 (N.C. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

The Rule will be considered discharged as to these parties severally, on their filing answers, that they were not privy to the publication of the paper referred to in the Rule on the 19th of April, 1869, and do not approve of it. Or otherwise making a disavowal, on oath, of any intention, in signing and publishing said paper, to commit a contempt of the Supreme Court, or to impair the respect due to its authority.

Note. — Afterwards, at various times during the term, answers substantially concurring with that given in the above report, were filed by Messrs Eaton, Conigland, Davis, Jenkins, Merrimon, Tenable, York, Barham, Busbee, Eogers, Batchelor, Dortch, Strong and Whiting, and thereupon the rule was ordered to be discharged likewise as to them.

Should any one or more elect to ask for a day to show cause, the day will be fixed, on motion, at any time during this term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Rule will be considered discharged as to these parties severally, on their filing answers, that they were not privy to the publication of the paper referred to in the Rule on the 19th of April, 1869, and do not approve of it. Or otherwise making a disavowal, on oath, of any intention, in signing and publishing said paper, to commit a contempt of the Supreme Court, or to impair the respect due to its authority.

Note. — Afterwards, at various times during the term, answers substantially concurring with that given in the above report, were filed by Messrs Eaton, Conigland, Davis, Jenkins, Merrimon, Tenable, York, Barham, Busbee, Eogers, Batchelor, Dortch, Strong and Whiting, and thereupon the rule was ordered to be discharged likewise as to them.

Should any one or more elect to ask for a day to show cause, the day will be fixed, on motion, at any time during this term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 N.C. 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rogers-nc-1869.