In Re Roger Zaczek

917 F.2d 23, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19358, 1990 WL 165806
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Roger Zaczek. Read the opinion of the Court — 902 F.2d 31
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 31, 1990·No. 90-8034·Unpublished

Opinion

917 F.2d 23
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re Roger ZACZEK, Petitioner.

No. 90-8034.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 1, 1990.
Decided Oct. 31, 1990.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Roger Zaczek, appellant pro se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Roger Zaczek, a Virginia prisoner, mailed a 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint to the district court in April 1990 and paid the filing fee in June 1990. However, the complaint was not promptly filed in the district court. Zaczek brought this petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to file his complaint.

Because the delay in the district court proceedings since payment of the filing fee has been less than six months, we hold that mandamus relief is not warranted. Consequently, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid in the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Roger Zaczek, 917 F.2d 23, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19358, 1990 WL 165806 (4th Cir. 1990).

917 F.2d 23 (In Re Roger Zaczek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.