In re Roger S.
390 N.E.2d 1179, 47 N.Y.2d 750, 417 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2019
This text of 390 N.E.2d 1179 (In re Roger S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Roger S., 390 N.E.2d 1179, 47 N.Y.2d 750, 417 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2019 (N.Y. 1979).
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli and Wachtler. Judge Jones dissents and votes to affirm in the following opinion in which Judge Fuchsberg concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Williams v. Katz
23 F.3d 190 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
390 N.E.2d 1179, 47 N.Y.2d 750, 417 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roger-s-ny-1979.