In re Roger MM.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Roger MM.

96 A.D.2d 1133, 466 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19801

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 23, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 1133 (In re Roger MM.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Roger MM., 96 A.D.2d 1133, 466 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Application by petitioner for an advance ruling with respect to past conduct pursuant to 22 NYCRR 805.1 (o) of the Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department. Upon review of the petition and all of the other letters, affidavits and records submitted upon this application, and upon consideration of the recommendation of the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Third Judicial District, the court is of the view that petitioner’s history of past criminal conduct, which includes convictions for bank robbery and first degree murder, would operate to disqualify him, on character grounds, from being admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Casey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Application by petitioner for an advance ruling with respect to past conduct pursuant to 22 NYCRR 805.1 (o) of the Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department. Upon review of the petition and all of the other letters, affidavits and records submitted upon this application, and upon consideration of the recommendation of the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Third Judicial District, the court is of the view that petitioner’s history of past criminal conduct, which includes convictions for bank robbery and first degree murder, would operate to disqualify him, on character grounds, from being admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Casey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 1133, 466 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roger-mm-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack