in Re: Roger G. Washington

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 13, 2003
Docket01-03-00186-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Roger G. Washington (in Re: Roger G. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Roger G. Washington, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Opinion issued March 13, 2003





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-03-00186-CV



IN RE ROGER G. WASHINGTON, Relator



Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator requests that this Court compel respondent, the judge of the 339th District Court of Harris County, (1) to rule on a motion for discovery that relator filed on November 9, 2002 in cause number 684737-A. We deny the petition.

Relator has not provided us with a record that shows that he made any request of the respondent to perform a nondiscretionary act that respondent refused. See Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding).

The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.

PER CURIAM



Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Nuchia and Hanks.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

1.

Relator's petition names the Honorable Charles Hearn as respondent. However, the elected judge of the 339th District Court is the Honorable Caprice Cosper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnes v. State
832 S.W.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Roger G. Washington, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roger-g-washington-texapp-2003.