in Re: Roger Barone
Opinion
DENIED; Opinion Filed October 28, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00792-CV
IN RE ROGER BARONE, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-50207-2019
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Carlyle Before the Court is relator’s July 2, 2019 petition for writ of mandamus and real party in
interest’s September 3, 2019 reply. In his petition, relator requests this Court to set aside the trial
court’s February 11, 2019 temporary orders and vacate the trial court’s May 29, 2019 contempt
order. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must show both that the trial court has clearly
abused its discretion and that relators have no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins.
Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition,
mandamus record, and response, we conclude relator has failed to show he is entitled to the relief
requested.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a)
(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/Cory L. Carlyle/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
190792F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Roger Barone (in Re: Roger Barone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.