in Re: Rogelio Marquez
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS §
IN RE: ROGELIO MARQUEZ, § No. 08-20-00246-CV
Relator. § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
§ IN MANDAMUS
§ ORDER
On June 24, 2021, the Court ordered the Honorable Lyda Ness Garcia to either file a
motion to withdraw in conformity with Tex.R.App.P 6.5 or provide a rationale for continued
representation of the real party interest. A motion to withdraw was filed on July 15, 2021, but
the motion is not in conformity with Rule 6.5 in this regard: the motion omits the real party in
interest’s last known address and telephone number. See Tex.R.App. 6.5(a)(2). An internet
address as stated in the motion is not sufficient (note Rule 6.5(b) requires the motion to be sent
by regular and certified mail to the party’s last known address). The Honorable Lyda Ness
Garcia is ordered to amend the motion to withdraw to bring it into compliance with Rule 6.5 by
July 26, 2021.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of July, 2021.
Before Palafox, J., Alley, J., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.) Marion, C.J. (Ret.), sitting by assignment
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Rogelio Marquez (in Re: Rogelio Marquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.