in Re Rodolfo Estrada, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 7, 2014
Docket01-14-00819-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Rodolfo Estrada, Jr. (in Re Rodolfo Estrada, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Rodolfo Estrada, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Opinion issued November 6, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00819-CR ——————————— IN RE RODOLFO ESTRADA, JR., Relator

Original Proceeding on Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Rodolfo Estrada, Jr., has filed an “Application for Writ of Habeas

Corpus to Set an Appeal Bond,” contending that, pending his appeal of his

conviction, he is being unlawfully confined and restrained without benefit of bail and has been denied bail “in abridgement of his constitutional and statutory right of

bail.”1 We dismiss the application for want of jurisdiction.

This Court does not have “original habeas corpus jurisdiction of a bail issue”

in a criminal case. Ortiz v. State, 299 S.W.3d 930, 932 (Tex. App.—Amarillo

2009, no pet.) (citing TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (West 2004) and Ex

parte Enriquez, 2 S.W.3d 362, 363 & n.1 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, orig.

proceeding) (mem. op.)); see Chavez v. State, 132 S.W.3d 509, 510 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.) (citing TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West

2004)) (“A court of appeals does not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in

felony cases.”). Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant

relief in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding when there is a final

conviction in a felony case. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West

Supp. 2014); Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117

(Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

Accordingly, we dismiss the application for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

1 The petition identifies the underlying case as Rodolfo Estrada, Jr. v. The State of Texas, cause no. 1321081, in the 174th District Court of Harris County Texas, the Honorable Ruben Guerrero presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chavez v. State
132 S.W.3d 509 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Ex Parte Enriquez
2 S.W.3d 362 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Ortiz v. State
299 S.W.3d 930 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Padieu, Philippe, Relator v. Court of Appeals of Texas, 5th District
392 S.W.3d 115 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Rodolfo Estrada, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rodolfo-estrada-jr-texapp-2014.