In re Rodney W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rodney W.

6 A.D.3d 250, 774 N.Y.S.2d 339, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4510

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.3d 250 (In re Rodney W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rodney W., 6 A.D.3d 250, 774 N.Y.S.2d 339, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about July 24, 2003, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted robbery in the third degree, attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[251]*251The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification. The victim had an ample opportunity to observe appellant, and she was able to provide a detailed description. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about July 24, 2003, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted robbery in the third degree, attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[251]*251The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification. The victim had an ample opportunity to observe appellant, and she was able to provide a detailed description. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.3d 250, 774 N.Y.S.2d 339, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rodney-w-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack