In re Rodney Michael Jones

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided January 25, 2018·No. 17-BG-1251·Published

Opinion

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 17-BG-1251

IN RE RODNEY MICHAEL JONES 2017 DDN 192

An Administratively Suspended Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 993968

BEFORE: Beckwith, Associate Judge, and Washington and Farrell, Senior Judges.

ORDER

(FILED – January 25, 2018)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent by consent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction; this court’s December 5, 2017, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the response thereto, and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g) affidavit; and the December 29, 2017, letter from Disciplinary Counsel stating that any discipline should be imposed nunc pro tunc to December 5, 2017, it is

ORDERED that Rodney Michael Jones is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia nunc pro tunc to December 5, 2017. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rodney Michael Jones, (D.C. 2018).

In re Rodney Michael Jones (In re Rodney Michael Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)