in Re: Rodney Earl Randolph
This text of in Re: Rodney Earl Randolph (in Re: Rodney Earl Randolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed October 3, 2002.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-02-00991-CV
IN RE RODNEY EARL RANDOLPH, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
O P I N I O N
On September 24, 2002, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his petition, he seeks to compel the Hon. Debbie Mantooth Stricklin, Judge of the 180th District Court in Harris County, to consider and rule on his post-conviction motion for forensic DNA testing and to appoint him counsel, pursuant to Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. We deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Opinion filed October 3, 2002.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Hudson and Fowler.
Do Not Publish ‑ Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Rodney Earl Randolph, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rodney-earl-randolph-texapp-2002.