In re Rodman
This text of 247 A.D. 816 (In re Rodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to direct the board of elections of the city of New York to accept the designating petitions of Bertha Rodman and William Rodman as candidates for the office of county committeeman of the Republican party in the fifty-fourth election district of the sixth Assembly district of Queens county and to place their names on the ballot for the primary election to be held on April 2, 1936, affirmed on authority of Matter of Wood v. Board of Elections (ante, p. 322), decided herewith. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Adel, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons stated in their dissenting memorandum in Matter of Wood v. Board of Elections (ante, pp. 322, 323).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.D. 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rodman-nyappdiv-1936.