In re Rodgers

718 A.2d 296
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 15, 1998
DocketNo. 446 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 718 A.2d 296 (In re Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Rodgers, 718 A.2d 296 (Pa. 1998).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 1998, Edward Keith Rodgers having been disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated May 7, 1998; the said Edward Keith Rodgers having been directed on August 5, 1998, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Edward Keith Rodgers is disbarred from the practice of law in this-[297]*297Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
718 A.2d 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rodgers-pa-1998.