in Re: Roderick Dickerson

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 22, 2005·No. 14-05-00279-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 22, 2005

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 22, 2005.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-00279-CV

____________

IN RE RODERICK DICKERSON, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On March 18, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  He sought a copy of the record in his criminal appeal, in which his appointed counsel has filed a frivolous appeal brief under the guidelines of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)..

Because an order has issued in relator=s criminal appeal directing the district clerk to provide relator a copy of the record, the relief requested in this mandamus is moot.  Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 22, 2005.

Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Seymore, and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Roderick Dickerson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

in Re: Roderick Dickerson (in Re: Roderick Dickerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)