in Re: Roderick Dickerson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 22, 2005
Docket14-05-00279-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Roderick Dickerson (in Re: Roderick Dickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Roderick Dickerson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 22, 2005

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 22, 2005.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-00279-CV

IN RE RODERICK DICKERSON, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On March 18, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  He sought a copy of the record in his criminal appeal, in which his appointed counsel has filed a frivolous appeal brief under the guidelines of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)..

Because an order has issued in relator=s criminal appeal directing the district clerk to provide relator a copy of the record, the relief requested in this mandamus is moot.  Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 22, 2005.

Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Seymore, and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Roderick Dickerson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roderick-dickerson-texapp-2005.