in Re: Roderick Dickerson
This text of in Re: Roderick Dickerson (in Re: Roderick Dickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 22, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00279-CV
IN RE RODERICK DICKERSON, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On March 18, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. He sought a copy of the record in his criminal appeal, in which his appointed counsel has filed a frivolous appeal brief under the guidelines of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)..
Because an order has issued in relator=s criminal appeal directing the district clerk to provide relator a copy of the record, the relief requested in this mandamus is moot. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 22, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Seymore, and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Roderick Dickerson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roderick-dickerson-texapp-2005.